• Home
  • RELIGION IS NOT. . .PART I
  • THE SEARCHER-SEEKER

Searcher-Seeker

Musings of a lifelong searcher-seeker

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« CONSIDER, ‘TRUTH’ — PART I. . .
CONFUCIUS SAYS. . . »

CONSIDER, ‘TRUTH’ – PART II. . .

April 28, 2020 by Searcher Seeker

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered, the point is to discover them. –Gandhi

The Consensus Theory of Truth.  This theory is rooted in the idea that truth is what the ‘vast’ majority of the people believe.  In our example from PART I, if the vast majority of the people at the game affirmed that this certain player did play in the game (and you were not there to see it for yourself) then you could accept their affirmation as truth.  This theory of truth is frequently drawn on by folks in order to confirm that what they are saying is true.  This ‘truth’ can easily be disconfirmed and turned into ‘fallacy’ – ask any politician who uses this theory as a means of telling us the truth.  [Note: the word ‘consensus’ is/ can be misleading for we are not talking about ‘true’ consensus; we are talking about the ‘majority’s’ position.]

The Pragmatic Theory of Truth. Pragmatism holds that truth is whatever is useful and profitable to us, and whatever brings us benefit.  For William James, one of the great pragmatists, this meant that truth was ‘changeable,’ rather than something concrete and absolute.  James believed that it often takes a long time to figure out whether something is true or not, based on whether it ‘works successfully’ [much like one trying to distinguish the true prophet from the false prophet; only over time can you really be sure who is who].  For example, when it came to God, James said that there was no real proof for God’s existence and so there was very little ‘reason’ as to why one should believe that God does exist.  However, James believed that if a person found that believing in God help’s one live a virtuous life and a more fulfilling life, then for that person, the truth is that there is a God.

How do we know if a claim is true?  Put simply, what kind of evidence counts depends upon what kind of claim is made as regards what is ‘true.’  Here is one:

Opinions.  These are never false, because the evidence is in the mind of the person giving the opinion.  For example: ‘I don’t like lima beans.’  Is this statement true or false?  In order for you to know you have to be able to enter into my mind – this is impossible (at this time anyway).  Since it is impossible, there is no ‘reason’ to doubt my statement.  Of course, opinions don’t count for much when it comes to ‘persuading another about a truth’ – for all of us have our own opinions.

In order to decide if evidence is convincing we first of all have to know what type of claim is being made.  Claims come in at least three types:

An Empirical Claim.  This claim makes a statement about the world.  For example: The moon is made of green cheese.  We need scientific knowledge in order to test an empirical claim.  Scientific knowledge is public information gained by careful observation, experiments and confirmations.  Today, we have a great deal of evidence that the moon is made up of certain types of rock, not green cheese.

An Analytical Claim.  The claim makes the statement about the meaning of words or other symbols.  For example: The Constitution gives us freedom of speech.  We need knowledge about words and symbols in order to test an analytical claim.  We might consult a document (e.g. The Constitution) or a dictionary or some other reference in order to discover how people have agreed to interpret a word.  This is no easy task; ask anyone who has attempted it. [Consider: ‘Freedom’ – Progressives and Conservatives do not embrace the same definition for this word/concept.]

A Valuative Claim.  This claim makes a statement about what is good or bad, right or wrong.  For example: People should read books and not watch reality t.v. programs.  To test a valuative claim we generally appeal to standards of value.  In this case, the standard might be the value of literacy.  Valuative claims are rooted in deep assumptions about empirical claims (reading and watching t.v.).  For example, we might assume that reading makes us more literate than watching reality t.v. programs; we might assume that being literate is important when it comes to being a good citizen; we might assume that being literate is more valuable than being illiterate.  Responding to valuative claims requires us to decide which value standard is higher.  Like analytical claims, engaging valuative claims is challenging if not daunting.

So, here are two ‘simple’ questions to help guide us: What kind of claim is being made?  What evidence supports the claim?  The search for the truth is not an easy search.  I end this brief exploration with one more question: Is the search for truth worth my time and energy?   Mark Twain remind us:

If you tell the truth you don’t have to remember anything.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Uncategorized |

  • Recent Posts

    • A QUESTION I OFFER FOR REFLECTION
    • THINKING ABOUT CHANGE
    • FIVE COMMANDMENTS, PART II
    • FIVE COMMANDMENTS, PART I
    • THE NEVER-ENDING QUESTION
  • Archives

    • August 2022 (5)
    • July 2022 (8)
    • June 2022 (15)
    • May 2022 (15)
    • April 2022 (15)
    • March 2022 (15)
    • February 2022 (13)
    • January 2022 (13)
    • December 2021 (15)
    • November 2021 (10)
    • October 2021 (13)
    • September 2021 (10)
    • August 2021 (14)
    • July 2021 (13)
    • June 2021 (15)
    • May 2021 (15)
    • April 2021 (14)
    • March 2021 (15)
    • February 2021 (14)
    • January 2021 (14)
    • December 2020 (14)
    • November 2020 (16)
    • October 2020 (14)
    • September 2020 (15)
    • August 2020 (12)
    • July 2020 (14)
    • June 2020 (13)
    • May 2020 (12)
    • April 2020 (12)
    • March 2020 (11)
    • February 2020 (12)
    • January 2020 (13)
    • December 2019 (11)
    • November 2019 (12)
    • October 2019 (14)
    • September 2019 (11)
    • August 2019 (12)
    • July 2019 (10)
    • June 2019 (11)
    • May 2019 (12)
    • April 2019 (15)
    • March 2019 (13)
    • February 2019 (14)
    • January 2019 (10)
    • December 2018 (12)
    • November 2018 (10)
    • October 2018 (10)
    • September 2018 (7)
    • August 2018 (9)
    • July 2018 (12)
    • June 2018 (10)
    • May 2018 (8)
    • April 2018 (11)
    • March 2018 (12)
    • February 2018 (13)
    • January 2018 (12)
    • December 2017 (10)
    • November 2017 (11)
    • October 2017 (13)
    • September 2017 (14)
    • August 2017 (12)
    • July 2017 (12)
    • June 2017 (14)
    • May 2017 (14)
    • April 2017 (14)
    • March 2017 (14)
    • February 2017 (12)
    • January 2017 (13)
    • December 2016 (15)
    • November 2016 (15)
    • October 2016 (12)
    • September 2016 (12)
    • August 2016 (13)
    • July 2016 (9)
    • June 2016 (14)
    • May 2016 (14)
    • April 2016 (14)
    • March 2016 (15)
    • February 2016 (14)
    • January 2016 (15)
    • December 2015 (15)
    • November 2015 (15)
    • October 2015 (15)
    • September 2015 (15)
    • August 2015 (13)
    • July 2015 (11)
    • June 2015 (13)
    • May 2015 (11)
    • April 2015 (15)
    • March 2015 (15)
    • February 2015 (13)
    • January 2015 (16)
    • December 2014 (14)
    • November 2014 (15)
    • October 2014 (14)
    • September 2014 (12)
    • August 2014 (10)
    • July 2014 (13)
    • June 2014 (11)
    • May 2014 (14)
    • April 2014 (14)
    • March 2014 (16)
    • February 2014 (13)
    • January 2014 (14)
    • December 2013 (14)
    • November 2013 (14)
    • October 2013 (14)
    • September 2013 (13)
    • August 2013 (14)
    • July 2013 (16)
    • June 2013 (13)
    • May 2013 (23)
    • April 2013 (29)
    • March 2013 (31)
    • February 2013 (28)
    • January 2013 (31)
    • December 2012 (29)
    • November 2012 (30)
    • October 2012 (31)
    • September 2012 (30)
    • August 2012 (31)
    • July 2012 (31)
    • June 2012 (30)
    • May 2012 (31)
    • April 2012 (30)
    • March 2012 (31)
    • February 2012 (16)
  • Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 45 other followers

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Searcher-Seeker
    • Join 45 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Searcher-Seeker
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: