Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for June, 2019

Awareness does not bring comfort or solace.; it brings disturbance –Robert K. Greenleaf

One of the most challenging things for us to do is to wake up, become aware, listen to what is emerging from within oneself, listen to what is emerging in the ‘world’ and to ‘see.’  We don’t want to engage this process of ‘seeing.’  For example, the Capitalist does not want to see what is good and healthy in Socialism.  The rich do not want to ‘see’ the poor.  The tribe does not want to see the full humanity of the stranger.

Why don’t we want to embrace this process of ‘seeing’?  Consider this, Gentle Reader, if one engages in this process two things might occur: The one ‘seeing’ might well become disturbed by what one ‘sees’ and given what one ‘sees’ one might be called to change or transform [transform = a fundamental change in character or structure].

If one looks and one becomes disturbed one begins to sense a potential loss of control – the loss of the control of the life that one is holding onto.  If one chooses to embrace and engage in this process of ‘seeing’ one must also embrace the possibility that one will have to, at minimum, change or at maximum, transform.

When it comes to our ‘seeing,’ Anthony de Mello offers us three questions to hold, consider, embrace and live:

  • How much are you ready to take? [think: How much ‘seeing’ can you embrace]
  • How much of everything you’ve held dear are you ready to have shattered, without running away?
  • How ready are you to think of something unfamiliar? [think: hold the possibility that you will have to change or transform as a result]

As one embraces and engages this process of ‘seeing’ one – because one is awake and aware – becomes disturbed by the ‘fear’ that is emerging from within.  This is not the ‘fear of the unknown.’  Actually, one cannot become fear-full of the unknown.  It does seem, however, that what one fears is the loss of the known. (Think, for example, the loss of ‘identity’ as one of the potential losses that helps generate and sustain this ‘fear of loss’.)

A second fear one has is the fear that comes with the awareness that one will have to change or transform and in order to embrace and engage this process one will have to let go or empty in order to make room for the new (think: the ‘new’ way of seeing, for example).  Who wants to give up his/her identity?

A third fear one becomes aware of is the fear of isolation or abandonment or shunning by one’s ‘tribe’ (think: family, religious group, political party, club, etc.).  We are social beings and being ‘part of’ is crucial for our well-being.  What will I do if I am ostracized by one or more of these ‘tribes’?

One of my role-models is Jesus.  Jesus was awake, aware and often disturbed by what he saw.  One of the things Jesus modeled for me was how comfortable he was with ‘sinners’ and how uncomfortable he was with ‘the self-righteous.’  Jesus never, not once, indicated that he was better than the ‘sinner.’  Jesus modeled what it was to embrace all human beings without embracing their actions.  He ‘saw’ the fully human being and he responded to the fully human being.

This leads me to the fourth fear.  This is the fear of ‘seeing’ each person as a fully human being.  The implications of ‘seeing’ each person as a fully human being are legion.  By the by, all faith traditions tell us that God will judge each of us based on how we have ‘seen’ and ‘responded’ to our ‘brother’ and ‘sister’ human beings.

If I see you as a fully human being then I must treat you as I want to be treated – for most of us this means that we will treat THE OTHER(S) with compassion, care, love and forgiveness.  We will feed the hungry and shelter the home-less and tend to those who are sick (physically, intellectually, emotionally, and/or spiritually).

Given all of this it is no wonder that so many of us continue to choose to not wake up and become aware and ‘see’.

I am called to be faithful. –Mother Teresa

Read Full Post »

I cannot remember how many times I have been advised to not sweat the small things.  I cannot recall how many times I even said these words to others.  Perhaps this admonishment is a helpful guideline – perhaps.

A few months ago I was sitting here in one of my not so favorite coffee shops which is located close to where I was going to have a good thinking session with a thought-partner.  As I attempted to settle into a quite uncomfortable chair – one of many in this shop – one of my initial responses was to say, this is a small thing, you will only be here for an hour or so, don’t sweat it.  Then I paused.

Small things can, and often do, make a difference.  I remember my mother being hurt by family members not sending thank you notes – I was, at times, one of those who did not.  Internally I also remember saying, mom this is a small thing, don’t sweat it while externally I attempted to put balm on her wound [which probably didn’t help – the wound had been delivered].

These past few years I have become aware of the power of those little thank you notes as I experience a type of ‘wound’ that is inflicted when a niece or nephew, and now grandniece or grandnephew do not take the time to send a note or send an email and thank me for their gift [I am blessed in that my two children, now adults, continue to respond to me with gratitude – both in writing and verbally].

I remember spending time twenty-five years ago with a remarkable man; he was insistent on learning, retaining, and using people’s names and each day he would make sure he learned of employees who were ‘struggling’ with a work issue or with a family issue and he would send them a note; he would write out the note early in the morning or late in the day and send it off.

I asked him why.  It’s the small things that matter!  That was his reply.  I felt a story lurking behind his response so I asked him if a story did exist.  He paused and told me that when he was a young executive the ‘big boss’ stopped by his office and said, ‘John, welcome to the firm, I hope the wife and kids are fine.’  Then the ‘big boss’ turned on his heel and departed.  Bill said, he didn’t even know my name and I was not even married at the time.  He then added, it was a small thing in the big scheme of things, but I never fully trusted him again.  

 We all know, perhaps at several levels of our being that the small things do matter – no perhaps about it.

Read Full Post »

CAPITALISM-MARKETING-WATER. . .

There’s a sucker born every minute. –P.T. Barnum [?]

The dilemma of Capitalism.  Capitalism began by seeking ways to meet our needs.  However, more than 60 years ago now, in our Country, most of our reasonable needs have been met.  Now this upset the Capitalists.

The Capitalists asked with great astonishment: What?  Does this mean that you are going to stop buying stuff?  That’s not good news for Capitalism.  What are we going to make now?  How are we going to make a profit? 

Then a few of the Capitalists got together and asked themselves some questions: What if we figure out some new needs – needs that they did not know they had?  What if we manufactured some ‘needs’?  What if we created needs that don’t exist and marketed them and convinced folks that they needed what we will now make? 

The Capitalists switched from advertising to marketing.  Why this switch?  Consider that Marketing is designed to get people to ‘want/need’ a thing even though they don’t really ‘want/need’ it and even though they don’t really know what it is.  The examples are legion.  But, this morning, Gentle Reader, let us briefly explore just one: Water!

Bottled water is everywhere in our Country.  Many restaurants offer you an option, Tap Water or Bottled Water (some even offer boutique water (think: Perrier or Pellegrino – which are different from ‘Tap Water’).  Most bottled water comes out of a tap.  Yup!  True!  For Real!  I am talking about the bottled water that is sold everywhere in our Country.

Is tap water not safe to drink?  Our Country has a fine aquifer and aqueduct system – a system that uses little energy to transport the water.  The infrastructure that provides us and carries our fresh water has long been paid for – we have, then, the equivalent of ‘free water.’

How much money did we spend on bottled water in 2009 in our Country (the latest statistics that I could find)?  Twenty-five BILLION dollars!  U.U. (Utterly Unnecessary)

Now we also know that it’s the plastic that causes the carbon imprint of these bottles.  Capitalists created a faux need (that’s ‘fake’ for those who don’t speak French – well, actually, I don’t speak French but I love the word ‘faux’ and wanted to use it).

Now, Gentle Reader, consider this:  New York – yes, that New York – has some of the best water in our Country – yet restaurants there do a booming business selling bottled water.

We don’t need it.  We buy bottled water because we have accepted the marketer’s ploy.  We also created all sorts of rationales for buying bottled water at restaurants or from our stores.  We, suckers, have convinced ourselves that we need bottled water.

Consider this: Coca Cola and Pepsi learned that thirsty folks did not drink their soft drinks in order to quench their thirst – they knew that their soft drinks created a thirst they did not quench a thirst (one way they hooked us on soft drinks).  Sales, during the summer months, actually decreased.  They decided to bottle and sell us water.  In 2009 they made more money selling us bottled water than they did selling us soft drinks.

Now I am going to up the ante.  In 2009 while we were spending 25 Billion on bottled water, about 3 billion people around the world did not have access to clean, potable water; indeed about 2 billion did not have access to water they could wash their clothes in without contaminating them.  Luckily, there were young Capitalists who want to address this identified need.

A small firm in Denmark asked: Why don’t we figure out how to get clean water to these folks?  They figured it out.  They invented the LifeStraw – google it and you will learn.  By the by, the straw costs about US$2.00.  It will produce enough clean water for one person for THREE YEARS.  Talk about cost-effective.  As ‘true’ Capitalists, they identified a ‘real human need’ – one we all have – and addressed it. [By the by, for every LifeStraw product you purchase on Amazon or from LifeStraw, a school child in need will receive safe water for an entire school year. AND, you will save two-plus years of plastic bottles.]

I finally weaned myself from bottled water this past February.  One tiny-tiny step for mankind.   Do I know you well-enough to call you ‘Sucker’?  How about ‘My Fellow-Sucker’?  The Capitalists and Marketers have certainly learned from Barnum and Fields.  How about us, ‘Suckers,’ what have we learned?

Never give a sucker an even break. –W.C. Fields

Read Full Post »

The world we have created is a product of our thinking; it cannot be changed without changing our thinking. –Albert Einstein

Good morning, Gentle Reader.  This will be my last entry for this topic at this time.

Foreign fossil fuel.  This is perhaps our Nation’s greatest dependency.  What does this mean?  Among a number of meanings, it means that we are trapped into being interested and involved in the parts of the world where fossil fuels are produced, whether it’s Venezuela or Russia or the Middle East.

No responsible President will walk away from this entrapment.  It is easy to say – or to write – that we should not be involved in those places, but we are involved in those places.  Our entire economy depends on the oil coming out of, for instance, Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia – a country that holds and supports the Wahabist ideology.  This is the ideology that is embraced by Al Qaeda – the dollars we pay for oil are the dollars that support Al Qaeda.  If we want to cut off a major source of funding for Al Qaeda, we would go after the Wahabists in Saudi Arabia.

This, of course, we won’t do – this, of course we can’t do.  Why?  Because a quarter of the gasoline we use is produced by the Saudis.  We need the Saudis, so never mind Al Qaeda.

Neither can we walk away from Iraq because they are also a big producer of the oil we need.  Now, Iran presents another challenge because they also control vast amounts of oil reserves.

Instead of asking this question: Should we really be buying our oil from these countries?  We ask: Where will get the oil to drive our cars?  This second question is the key question for us.  We need our cars.  Driving our cars means we are committed to a foreign policy that is interventionist, whether it’s for military or state-building purposes, or to support leaders who are known to be human rights abusers.

Now, we are not evil people.  We are, however, thinking as Consumers; we are not thinking as Citizens.  We are thinking that markets are the solution (we are told this over and over and over again almost every day – in fact, when one challenges the markets one is deemed to be ‘Un-American.’  After 9/11 President Bush told us to go to the malls and shop.  After the recession of 2008 President Obama told us to go to the malls and shop).

As Consumers we opt out of making public choices – choices that would provide us the opportunity to actually co-create the framework in which we live.  This framework would enable us to say no to carbon emissions, to say no to an oil-dependent economy.

Instead, we say that our elected officials are ‘stupid’ and they don’t value (think: accept) ‘science.’  The reality is that in a market economy the logic of Consumers trumps (pun intended) the logic of Citizens.  Politicians are smart, they know that if they are going to be elected then they must win over, not the Citizen, but the Consumer (it appears that our politicians are committed to the Consumer – privatization and not to the Citizen – the Public Good and this makes sense, for it is the Consumer, not the Citizen that will elect them).

As Consumers, we Americans are correct in believing that fossil fuel is good, that cars are good.  Of course cars are good.  There is little good public transportation in our country.  How are we going to get around if we don’t have a car?

Well, Gentle Reader, this is the situation you and I (WE) are mired in.  We will be mired in this muck for the foreseeable future.

YET, the very political issue we must deal with centers around our choice: To continue to be Consumers or to become the Citizens that we are called to become.  As always in our history, We The People will have to decide.  We The People will decide.  Thus far, We The People have decided that it is better for us to be Consumers than it is for us to be Citizens.

Excuse me, I must sign off for now.  I have to go to the gas station and fill up my gas tank.

One of the truest tests of integrity is its blunt refusal to be compromised. –Chinua Achabe (Nigerian Poet)

 

 

 

Read Full Post »

It is astonishing what a different result one gets by changing the metaphor. –George Eliot (‘The Mill on the Floss’)

Over and over again we make decisions that are pro-consumer and anti-citizen – pro-individual and anti-community.  Consider just one example.

There are what the economist Milton Friedman called ‘externalities.’  Simply put, every value that is not economic is deemed to be an ‘externality.’ And externalities do not count (pun intended).  Let us think a bit about the automobile and climate change/global warming.  As consumers in our country we make thousands of decisions that make all of the sense in the world for us in terms of our personal desires AND yet they make no sense in terms of the social cost, the public cost, the community cost.

Climate change/global warming has a social cost AND yet this cost, thanks to Milton and others, is not considered when we think of ‘price.’  There are lots of folks who declare that it is too expensive – the cost is too high – when it comes to dealing with climate change/global warming.  Yet, there are true costs, social costs, built into cc/gw that are far more expensive but are not calculated, because they are externalities.  [AN ASIDE: Remember, Gentle Reader, the person who defines words and concepts and who then has the definitions accepted has the power; the same holds when it comes to the metaphors chosen.]

In 2009, Benjamin R. Barber calculated the ‘real cost’ of a gallon of gasoline – the cost we all pay.  He noted that a gallon of gas in 2009 ACTUALLY cost $12.00.  And he only calculated the impact on our environment caused by automobile emissions – emissions are part of the social cost that Milton deemed to be an externality.  Now that, Gentle Reader, was a 2009 calculation and only focused on one social impact.

Benjamin also figured that if we simply closed all of the loop holes and fully embraced the environmental controls already in place that gas might climb to $8.00 a gallon and this is still far short of the $12.00.  With the alternative sources currently available the $8.00 would also come down AND if we added more alternative sources the number would come down ever further.

Again, Gentle Reader, my point is that the economics of living in a country where citizens see themselves as consumers, where they make private choices without considering the social/public consequences of those choices is part of what’s wrong.  It is also part of what makes it so difficult for our Congress and our President to make wise decisions that science indicates that we must make BUT that make no sense ‘politically’ in a world where the social costs are ‘externalities’ and most of the things we pay for have a price that is not factored into the ‘real cost.’

Consider that were we to include the cost of externalities (seeking the ‘true cost’) in the cost of fossil fuel, then fossil fuel would become uncompetitive – even against the most expensive forms of alternative energy.

If we were to choose to change our current national metaphor from ‘banking’ to ‘community’ and from ‘consumer’ to ‘citizen’ and if we were to include the social cost and eliminate the concept of ‘externality’ as we now use it then we might be able to not leave the next several generations with a ‘bill’ that they will not be able to pay.  [AN ASIDE: To add to the complication, we, in our nation, have integrated a false belief: Democracy = Capitalism.]

One more consideration: We know that as a nation we are currently dependent on fossil fuel.  Well, actually, we are dependent on foreign fossil fuel.  And that, as they say, is the rub.  What does this mean?  Consider this. . .

‘…he forces consideration upon the mind.’ –Description of Abe Lincoln

 

 

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »